Recognising Fetal Compromise in the Cardiograph during the Antenatal Period: Pearls and Pitfalls
Asian Journal of Medicine and Health,
There are several national and international guidelines to aid the interpretation of the cardiotocograph (CTG) trace during labour. These guidelines are based on assessing changes in the fetal heart rate (i.e. cardiograph) in response to mechanical and hypoxic stresses during labour secondary to ongoing frequency, duration and strength of uterine contractions (i.e. tocograph). However, during the antenatal period, uterine contractions are absent, and therefore, these intrapartum CTG guidelines cannot be used to reliably identify fetuses at risk of compromise. Computerised analysis of CTG using the Dawes-Redman Criteria could be used to detect fetal compromise. However, clinicians should be aware of the multiple pathways of fetal damage (i.e. inflammation, infection, intrauterine fetal stroke, chronic fetal anaemia, acute feto-maternal haemorrhage and fetal cardiac or neurological disorders) which can cause changes on the CTG trace which may not be recognised by using CTG guidelines.
- Antenatal cardiograph
- computerised CTG
- short term variability
- sinusoidal pattern
- Dawes-Redman Criteria
- Chronic Hypoxia
How to Cite
Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: Nomenclature, interpretation and general management principles. ACOG practice bulletin no. 106. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:192–202.
Chandraharan E, Arulkumaran S. Prevention of birth asphyxia: Responding appropriately to cardiotocograph (CTG) traces. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;21(4):609-624.
Street P, Dawes GS, Moulden M, Redman CWG. Short term variation in abnormal fetal heart rate records. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;80:673-678.
Dawes GS, Moulden M, Redman CW. Improvements in computerised fetal heart rate pattern analysis antepartum. J Perinat Med. 1996;24:25-36.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologist green-top guideline No. 31. 2nd edition. The Investigation and Management of the Small-for-Gestational-Age Fetus. RCOG; 2014.
Serra V, Bellver J. Moulden M, Redman CW. Computerized analysis of normal fetal heart rate pattern throughout gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34:74-9.
Pereira S, Chandraharan E. Recognition of chronic hypoxia and pre-existing foetal injury on the cardiotocograph (CTG): Urgent need to think beyond the guidelines. Porto Biomedical Journal. 2017;2(4):124-129.
Steer PJ. Commentary on ‘Antenatal cardiotocogram quality and interpretation using computers’. BJOG. 2014;121(7): 9-13.
Sonicaid fetal care antepartum analysis. (c) Huntleigh Healthcare Ltd. 2005;1(3).
Afors K, Chandraharan E. Use of continuous electronic fetal monitoring in a preterm fetus: Clinical dilemmas and recommendations for practice. J Pregnancy. 2011;848794.
Roberts D, Kumar B, Tincello D, Walkinshaw S. Computerised antenatal fetal heart rate recordings between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation. British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2001;108(8): 858-862.
Ayres-de-Campos D, Spong CY, Chandraharan E. FIGO intrapartum fetal monitoring expert consensus panel. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Cardiotocography. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131(1):13-24.
Pinas A, Chandraharan E. Continuous cardiotocography during labour: Analysis, classification and management. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;30:33-47.
Preti M, Chandraharan E. Importance of fetal heart rate cycling during the interpretation of the cardiotocograph (CTG). Int J Gynecol and Reprod Sci. 2018;1(1):10-12.
Galli L, Dall'Asta A, Whelehan V, Archer A, Chandraharan E. Intrapartum cardiotocography patterns observed in suspected clinical and subclinical chorioamnionitis in term fetuses. J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019.
Tincello D, White S, Walkinshaw S. Computerised analysis of fetal heart rate recordings in maternal type I diabetes mellitus. British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2001;108(8):853-857.
D’Antonio F, Bhide A, Antenatal cardiotocography. Chapter in: Handbook of CTG interpretation: From patterns to physiology. Chandraharan E (ed). Cambridge University Press; 2017.
Grivell RM, Alfirevic Z, Gyte GM, Devane D. Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;12(9).
Lees C, Marlow N, Arabin B, Bilardo CM, Brezinka C, Derks JB, Duvekot J, Frusca T, Diemert A, Ferrazzi E, Ganzevoort W, Hecher K, Martinelli P, Ostermayer E, Papageorghiou AT, Schlembach D, Schneider KT, Thilaganathan B, Todros T, van Wassenaer‐Leemhuis A, Valcamonico A, Visser GH, Wolf H. TRUFFLE Group. Perinatal morbidity and mortality in early‐onset fetal growth restriction: Cohort outcomes of the trial of randomized umbilical and fetal flow in Europe (TRUFFLE). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42:400–408.
Lees CC, Stampalija T, Baschat AA, da Silva Costa F, Ferrazzi E, Figueras F, Hecher K, Kingdom J, Poon LC, Salomon LJ, Unterscheider J. ISUOG practice guidelines: Diagnosis and management of small‐for‐gestational‐age fetus and fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;56:298–312.
Redman CWG, Moulden M. Avoiding CTG misinterpretation: A review of the latest Dawes-Redman CTG analysis. British Journal of Midwifery; 2017.
Gracia-Perez-Bonfils A, Vigneswaran K, Cuadras D, Chandraharan E. Does the saltatory pattern on cardiotocograph (CTG) trace really exist? The ZigZag pattern as an alternative definition and its correlation with perinatal outcomes [published online ahead of print. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;1-9.
Abstract View: 1549 times
PDF Download: 1426 times