The Role of Sensor Based Insole as a Rehabilitation Tool in Improving Walking among the Patients with Lower Limb Arthroplasty: A Protocol for Systematic Review

Main Article Content

Sumit Raghav
Anshika Singh
Suresh Mani
Gokulakannan Kandasamy
Amber Anand


Objectives: The purpose of this review protocol is to assess the role of sensor based insole in improving walking in patients with lower limb arthroplasty and to rule out the demand and advantage of sensor based insole in utilizing such types of problems at clinical setup.

Methodology: A systematic review will be conducted by two independent reviewers who will search articles using electronic search for publications in seven databases: Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, JSTOR, PubMed/Medline, Science Direct, Scopus and Web of Science. After applying the selection criteria, study papers published between the years 2001 to 2019 will be selected. Studies of human participants of 45-75 years of age having history of lower limb arthroplasty will be eligible. All the study papers will be analyzed using Modified Downs and Black scale and scores will be awarded for the items selected on a 27 point scale.

Findings: The findings of this review will be disseminated through presentations and peer-reviewed publication. The systematic review will direct the attention of the physiotherapists to assess and evaluate the patient’s walking pattern, as alterations in the biomechanics of joints of lower limb can produce far-reaching effects in the ideal or normal gait. The results of this review will provide evidence regarding changes in gait parameters in patients with lower limb arthroplasty and this information will be useful in planning for rehabilitation in improving walking of patients after lower limb arthroplasty.

Novelty: Many studies have been carried on sensor insole technology for monitoring gait. However, there is scarcity of literature based on the systematic reviews on the use of smart sensor insole in improving walking among patients with lower limb arthroplasty.

Arthroplasty, sensor insole, gait, rehabilitation

Article Details

How to Cite
Raghav, S., Singh, A., Mani, S., Kandasamy, G., & Anand, A. (2020). The Role of Sensor Based Insole as a Rehabilitation Tool in Improving Walking among the Patients with Lower Limb Arthroplasty: A Protocol for Systematic Review. Asian Journal of Medicine and Health, 18(9), 22-27.
Systematic Review Article


NCT02636751. Effects of Tele- or In-person Prehabilitation in Candidates Awaiting Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty.


Nam D, Abdel MP, Cross MB, et al. The management of extensor mechanism complications in total knee arthroplasty: AAOS exhibit selection. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A. Epub ahead of Print; 2014.

DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00949

Hawker GA, Badley EM, Borkhoff CM, et al. Which patients are most likely to benefit from total joint arthroplasty? Arthritis Rheum. Epub AHEAD of Print; 2013.

DOI: 10.1002/art.37901

Teasell R, Hussein N. Section 4A: Motor Rehabilitation (Lower Extremity). Stroke Rehabil Clin Handb.

Olivares A, Boetzel LMU Großhadern K, Allendoerfer J, et al. P57. Validation of gait analysis with inertial sensors-A P58. Primary hyperparathyroidism mimicking multiple sclerosis? A case report. Clin Neurophysiol. Epub Ahead of Print; 2015.

DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.04.190

Deleens R, Pickering G, Hadjiat Y. Pain in the elderly and cognition: State of play. Gériatrie Psychol Neuropsychiatr du Viellissement. Epub Ahead of Print; 2019.

DOI: 10.1684/pnv.2017.0702

Pillet H, Bonnet X, Lavaste F, et al. Evaluation of force plate-less estimation of the trajectory of the centre of pressure during gait. Comparison of two anthropometric models. Gait Posture. Epub ahead of print; 2010.

DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.09.014

Bennett TR, Wu J, Kehtarnavaz N, et al. Inertial measurement unit-based wearable computers for assisted living applications: A signal processing perspective. IEEE Signal Process Mag. Epub ahead of print; 2016.

DOI: 10.1109/MSP.2015.2499314

Nagano H, Begg RK. Shoe-insole technology for injury prevention in walking. Sensors (Switzerland); 18. Epub Ahead of Print; 2018.

DOI: 10.3390/s18051468

Al-Amri M, Nicholas K, Button K, et al. Inertial measurement units for clinical movement analysis: Reliability and concurrent validity. Sensors (Switzerland). Epub Ahead of Print; 2018.

DOI: 10.3390/s18030719

Mao A, Ma X, He Y, et al. Highly portable, sensor-based system for human fall monitoring. Sensors (Switzerland). Epub Ahead of Print; 2017.

DOI: 10.3390/s17092096

N.A. S, J.M. H, I. T, et al. Relationship of gait complexity to subsequent knee buckling and falls: the most study. Osteoarthr Cartil. Epub ahead of print 2020.


Teufl W, Taetz B, Miezal M, et al. Towards an inertial sensor-based wearable feedback system for patients after total hip arthroplasty: Validity and applicability for gait classification with gait kinematics-based features. Sensors (Switzerland). Epub Ahead of Print; 2019.

DOI: 10.3390/s19225006.

Liu T, Inoue Y, Shibata K. A simplified magnetometer calibration method to improve the accuracy of three-dimensional orientation measurement. ICIC Express Lett. 2012;6:523–528.

Li C, Wang Z, Xu L. Remote sensing image classification method based on support vector machines and fuzzy membership function. In: MIPPR 2005: SAR and Multispectral Image Processing. 2005. Epub Ahead of Print; 2005.

DOI: 10.1117/12.654981

Güner S, Haghari S, Alsancak S, et al. Effect of insoles with arch support on gait pattern in patients with multiple sclerosis. Turkish J Phys Med Rehabil. Epub Ahead of Print; 2018.

DOI: 10.5606/tftrd.2018.2246